Key Takeaways:
- BLS overestimated monthly payroll gains by 60,000 jobs in 2023.
- Fed’s tight monetary policy could worsen if labor market weakness is confirmed.
- QCEW data indicates a significant discrepancy with monthly payroll reports.
What Happened?
New data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggests the US job market isn’t as robust as previously thought. According to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), payrolls grew about 60,000 less per month in 2023 than the 250,000 initially reported.
This revelation comes from data covering over 95% of US jobs, contrasting sharply with the monthly employment reports. The discrepancy primarily arises from the adjustments made to account for new business openings and closures.
Why It Matters?
Understanding the true state of the labor market is crucial for investors and policymakers. If the job market is weaker than the Federal Reserve (Fed) believes, their efforts to control inflation by tightening monetary policy could be overly aggressive.
Barry Knapp, founder of Ironsides Macroeconomics, warns that the Fed may be operating on overly optimistic data, risking a deeper economic slowdown. Bloomberg Economics’ Anna Wong adds that the Fed might delay rate cuts, potentially exacerbating a downward spiral in employment.
What’s Next?
Investors should closely monitor upcoming employment reports and Fed announcements. The BLS will provide an initial revision of payroll figures in August, which could significantly impact market expectations. Additionally, keep an eye on how small businesses, vulnerable to high interest rates, fare in the coming months.
The mixed signals from various labor-market indicators suggest the Fed must tread carefully to avoid triggering a surge in unemployment, as cautioned by KPMG Chief Economist Diane Swonk.
The potential overestimation in monthly payrolls may change the narrative from a “boomy” to a “healthy” job market, according to economist Guy Berger. However, Moody’s Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi advises caution, noting that such data are often revised.
Furthermore, the recent influx of undocumented workers, more likely captured in monthly reports than in QCEW data, adds another layer of complexity to the labor market analysis.